<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Penalty ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation SEO Blog - Website Design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ADAC Video</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-5770</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAC Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-5770</guid>
		<description>I agree with SEO Carley

These drops in PR do not seem to have a corresponding drop in the SERPs at least with any of the site i do SEO on. 

I think Google is just trying to make it harder to sell links by dropping the PR, but are not at this time really penalizing the site. 

A 1 PR drop will not really affect the visitors view of most sites. In fact if the visitor doesn't have their own site, so that they are concerned with PR , most visitors don't even know what it is or how to figure out what a sites PR is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with SEO Carley</p>
<p>These drops in PR do not seem to have a corresponding drop in the SERPs at least with any of the site i do SEO on. </p>
<p>I think Google is just trying to make it harder to sell links by dropping the PR, but are not at this time really penalizing the site. </p>
<p>A 1 PR drop will not really affect the visitors view of most sites. In fact if the visitor doesn&#8217;t have their own site, so that they are concerned with PR , most visitors don&#8217;t even know what it is or how to figure out what a sites PR is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Google up to? PR Penalty &#187; SEO Blog &#124; UK Search Engine Optimisation Services &#124; Website Design</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Google up to? PR Penalty &#187; SEO Blog &#124; UK Search Engine Optimisation Services &#124; Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>[...] quick look and guess what Phoenirealm has dropped from PR5 to PR3, this is after a initial drop a few days [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quick look and guess what Phoenirealm has dropped from PR5 to PR3, this is after a initial drop a few days [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Carly</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Carly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3855</guid>
		<description>I don't know Joost, seems more like a glitch to me. I've just seen too many -1PR sites that don't sell links, nor do they have paid link characteristics.. One blog that took a drop doesn't even have a blog role, so the only OBL is to Wordpress.

Also blatant PR sellers that have so far gone completely unscathed.

The other thing too is most site's i have reviewed with a -1PR havn't missed a beat in the SERP's, alot have even risen in rankings... So if the little birdy is right, Google has done such a sloppy job at this whole scheme they may as well not have bothered.

Who knows, maybe the birdie has been told to whistle the wrong tune so everybody tears their links down. Remains to be seen i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Joost, seems more like a glitch to me. I&#8217;ve just seen too many -1PR sites that don&#8217;t sell links, nor do they have paid link characteristics.. One blog that took a drop doesn&#8217;t even have a blog role, so the only OBL is to Wordpress.</p>
<p>Also blatant PR sellers that have so far gone completely unscathed.</p>
<p>The other thing too is most site&#8217;s i have reviewed with a -1PR havn&#8217;t missed a beat in the SERP&#8217;s, alot have even risen in rankings&#8230; So if the little birdy is right, Google has done such a sloppy job at this whole scheme they may as well not have bothered.</p>
<p>Who knows, maybe the birdie has been told to whistle the wrong tune so everybody tears their links down. Remains to be seen i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>A little bird told me they penalized link sellers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little bird told me they penalized link sellers <img src='http://www.phoenixrealm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/google-penalty/#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>Google may win the paid links war in the short term, but in the long run I do not see them winning this one. Google have gone from being the friendly, intuitive search engine to one that suddenly thinks they are g0d. Someone will eventually come along and take over...

Google are guessing too much with their paid link algos, if someone has blatantly purchased a link with text link ads then fair enough. But if it cannot be proved, Google should keep away.

Why should you have to no-follow your clients? They are your clients and you have every right to promote them, both on an SEO level and regular traffic level. Just because their site is not directly related to yours doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to share some link love - after all it maybe an amazing, site with great content that you want to share with people!

I am just going on a massive rant! This stuff really gets to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may win the paid links war in the short term, but in the long run I do not see them winning this one. Google have gone from being the friendly, intuitive search engine to one that suddenly thinks they are g0d. Someone will eventually come along and take over&#8230;</p>
<p>Google are guessing too much with their paid link algos, if someone has blatantly purchased a link with text link ads then fair enough. But if it cannot be proved, Google should keep away.</p>
<p>Why should you have to no-follow your clients? They are your clients and you have every right to promote them, both on an SEO level and regular traffic level. Just because their site is not directly related to yours doesn&#8217;t mean you shouldn&#8217;t be able to share some link love - after all it maybe an amazing, site with great content that you want to share with people!</p>
<p>I am just going on a massive rant! This stuff really gets to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
