<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Domain Age Factor in Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation SEO Blog - Website Design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michaelj72</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-9762</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelj72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-9762</guid>
		<description>good points. i believe that not only is the domain age of the site linking to you/your site important but the age of the link per se affects page ranking. one reason i like to choose older directories to often submit too (but also realize that a relatively new directory or site today will be more 'valued' in 2 or 3 years too)

i always thought the major search engines would have access to info on when domains are bought and sold, and so would take that into consideration and generally discount links from an 'old domain' which has recently been bought - e.g. if an 'older domain' is bought and then suddenly gets 10,000 new links or whatever, I have the feeling the search engine would somehow flag that as unusual growth of links in a short period of time and look at it more closely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good points. i believe that not only is the domain age of the site linking to you/your site important but the age of the link per se affects page ranking. one reason i like to choose older directories to often submit too (but also realize that a relatively new directory or site today will be more &#8216;valued&#8217; in 2 or 3 years too)</p>
<p>i always thought the major search engines would have access to info on when domains are bought and sold, and so would take that into consideration and generally discount links from an &#8216;old domain&#8217; which has recently been bought - e.g. if an &#8216;older domain&#8217; is bought and then suddenly gets 10,000 new links or whatever, I have the feeling the search engine would somehow flag that as unusual growth of links in a short period of time and look at it more closely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matan Media</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7396</link>
		<dc:creator>Matan Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7396</guid>
		<description>Cheers Gary, I'm looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Gary, I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>Hi guys. Thanks for the comments.

@Paintworkz - There isn't anything bad about selling domains for good money but the point is that for those who do buy those domain names because of the age they should keep in mind that MSN (maybe other search engines too?) will also be looking at the age of external sites linking to that domain. So if they want to make the most of it they'd better be looking for ways to get inbound links from established sites.

@Matan - Good point. The reply might turn out a bit long so I'll be doing a post instead. Quick answer though...I agree that you have to do something to make sure you get relevant keywords in the anchor text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys. Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>@Paintworkz - There isn&#8217;t anything bad about selling domains for good money but the point is that for those who do buy those domain names because of the age they should keep in mind that MSN (maybe other search engines too?) will also be looking at the age of external sites linking to that domain. So if they want to make the most of it they&#8217;d better be looking for ways to get inbound links from established sites.</p>
<p>@Matan - Good point. The reply might turn out a bit long so I&#8217;ll be doing a post instead. Quick answer though&#8230;I agree that you have to do something to make sure you get relevant keywords in the anchor text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matan Media</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>Matan Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-domain-age-factor-in-links/#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>Hi Gary,

Nice post. You say "that organic link building is making more and more sense" and you are right, but only as part of a bigger link building campaign. Yes direct link building has become harder, as weak links from new sites are worth a lot less, but it is still vital to get some quality links from quality sites in - with correct anchor text and pointing to a relevant page on your site.

Organic link building is great, but does not always help you build links for specific keyword terms as more often than not you do not control the page in which the link is placed, you do not control the anchor text and you do not control where that link is pointing! You need these things to effectively rank for chosen keywords.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary,</p>
<p>Nice post. You say &#8220;that organic link building is making more and more sense&#8221; and you are right, but only as part of a bigger link building campaign. Yes direct link building has become harder, as weak links from new sites are worth a lot less, but it is still vital to get some quality links from quality sites in - with correct anchor text and pointing to a relevant page on your site.</p>
<p>Organic link building is great, but does not always help you build links for specific keyword terms as more often than not you do not control the page in which the link is placed, you do not control the anchor text and you do not control where that link is pointing! You need these things to effectively rank for chosen keywords.</p>
<p>Would love to hear your thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
