<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SEO Implications of Google Acquiring FeedBurner</title>
	<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-seo-implications-of-google-acquiring-feedburner/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation SEO Blog - Website Design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-seo-implications-of-google-acquiring-feedburner/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-seo-implications-of-google-acquiring-feedburner/#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>Hi Rita, the main purpose of most of my client blogs is to regularily add fresh content and word count to their existing sites. I find this can help in the SERPs, but their traffic and subscribe levels are low, so I certainly hope you are right. Thanks, Gary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rita, the main purpose of most of my client blogs is to regularily add fresh content and word count to their existing sites. I find this can help in the SERPs, but their traffic and subscribe levels are low, so I certainly hope you are right. Thanks, Gary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RitaCatita</title>
		<link>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-seo-implications-of-google-acquiring-feedburner/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>RitaCatita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phoenixrealm.com/the-seo-implications-of-google-acquiring-feedburner/#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>For me the main reason behind the Feedburner acquisition is to sell ads through the AdSense program. Is one more channel that google can control directly.

Using Feedburner stats in the ranking algorithms i think is not reasonable, because not every blogs use this system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the main reason behind the Feedburner acquisition is to sell ads through the AdSense program. Is one more channel that google can control directly.</p>
<p>Using Feedburner stats in the ranking algorithms i think is not reasonable, because not every blogs use this system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
    
        