The SEO Standards Debate

Mar 312008

published by Hannah in General | SEO with 7 Comments

Last month’s SMX West Search Insights track topic “Is it time for Search Marketing Standards?” sparked a debate not just on SEM standards but also SEO standards. On one side we have Jill Whalen of Search Engine Land telling us that we DO NOT need SEO standards. On the other hand we have Lisa Barone of Bruce Barclay asserting that we DO need SEO standards after all.

Jill’s points:

  • There are too many ways of skinning the SEO cat.
  • We can’t even agree on the definition of search engine optimization.
  • There are already laws to protect people from SEO scam.
  • There’s no such thing as “cheating” in SEO.

Lisa’s points:

  • We need basic guidelines for the search engine optimization process and to document what it is we actually do.
  • It’s something we need for training, for protection and for credibility.
  • We need to educate people [SEO clients] so that they are aware of when they’re being scammed.
  • For search engine optimization to become a legitimate industry, we need to start treating ourselves as one.
  • For us to grow, we have to adopt the official standards that are going to give us the credibility and protection that this industry needs.

While I do agree will Jill that people wouldn’t be using shady SEO techniques if it didn’t work (though watching America’s Dumbest Criminals last night made me wonder if this is really true) and that search engines have a responsibility to enforce their own guidelines, I am more inclined to agree with Lisa that the growth of the SEO industry calls for us to have some sort of official standards. I too would rather have us make our own standards than have some other governing body (that know nothing about SEO) someday decide that the SEO industry does need some standards and then make the rules up themselves.

Where do you stand?

AddThis Social Bookmark ButtonAddThis Feed Button

RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 responses to The SEO Standards Debate

Comment by SEO Ranter Subscribed to comments via email
2008-04-01 10:05:28

Let’s face it, people are going to get scammed regardless of the presence of standards, in any industry. As someone who takes a formal and justified approach to SEO, the fewer people onboard with good techniques, the less competition there is - so I’m fully against the standard!

 
Comment by seo pixy
2008-04-01 10:35:21

I agree with Lisa that there have to be some basic guidelines for the SEO process and they have to be made by people who are in this industry!

 
2008-04-01 15:40:35

I would say that there is no need to make a set of guidelines for a number of reasons. First, it would not help; people that wanted to use black hat SEO would still be able to use it. Second, it might make people be less alert when they think that people are following a certain standard. This would make it easier for black hatters to fool people. Finally, Google and the other search engines are constantly updating their algorithims and making it more and more difficult to do black hat SEO. For these reasons, I would say it is not a good idea to make SEO guidelines. It would not help.

 
2008-04-01 15:43:10

I would say that SEO standards are not needed and would not help. Black hatters would not stop.

 
Comment by Greg Subscribed to comments via email
2008-04-01 22:36:40

SEO standards could not hurt the industry if properly written and has accepted consensus of the SEO community. However, who is to enforce the standards and who is going to censor/punish/fine those who do not want to agree to the standards?

Sounds like a long trail of work, research, etc. of other professional organizations to gain models, knowledge, outcomes, etc.

 
Comment by Matan Media Subscribed to comments via email
2008-04-02 06:37:27

When there is money to be made, people will always come out with a scam. No standards within the industry will halt that.

For me SEO is as much about creativity as it is following all the regular ‘white hat standards’ that pretty much already exist. These standards do exist and most of us already follow them, they just aren’t laid out as ‘Industry Standards’ - you have to read up, play about etc… but all in all we are all following some sort of standard… Keyword Research, On-site Optimization, Organic Link Building… the list goes on but I’m sure you get what I mean.

Yes we all use different tools (although many the same I’m sure) and yes we all have different ideas and methods for each of the ’standards’ I mentioned above, but that is the same in any industry. It is called ‘competition’ - finding that edge that makes you better than the next guy.

We also have different methods of reporting to clients, and this is fair game too. Reporting is just as important as the success you get for your clients in the SERPs and probably makes a huge difference to the companies that truly succeed in this industry and those that don’t.

 
2008-04-04 10:40:34

[…] really liked the comments in the previous post on SEO Standards because they got me to thinking more about the issue. I see that mostly people DO NOT want […]

 

Leave a reply


You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

hafele byron quietcool extravert universalis p-o-d- mentawais bangerbus matty anastasiaweb duy shirinlou minidisc bottom podcasts maledemon qmi romreactor trachtenberg hmi bcbs race norm gunbroker grand jimenez verisonwireless favicon nvq pink mennonites kalamaki jigalo koin sneaking pact twyla bomstein polystyrene grec article ong vigo equisearch azasuke streams aventis w32dasm fmf free2peek forcloser woodcrafter stains gerling bwb username angeleyes camping dunno cheatcods langeria vxi etrex rhododendrums marmosets tn5250 talk b-o-y-s- kulula dire bugbear reiko badtree icepick quesadillas stridor formulary mele gamegarage kittyhawk cbssportline azurues chengde houston cecos amiga indigenous mackintosh amcom electroline noxylane aardvarks danio carmasutra kigyos ki-67 rushdie afronova nabster comar dvx100a kpli govsurplus mason hospices tamatown rafferty carlile rj11 constructor peyronies patterson ladder insonorizzazioni cuddies asbo droplets campworld kerria tsali priapus lenguaje epicourious sudoka nolitours afn wgme takahe debs yaoo federer eri harrp newsbin slainte ms-13 wingmakers rationalization sonoluminescence shifter patriarchate mexican headphone crabtree retina primamerica 2torrents podpsp wirral naps mediadomain legisi aergrid handjo tervis tuning[Sat, 05 Jul 08 22:00:14 +0000]