Why Buying Links is NOT a Good SEO Practice

Feb 262008

published by Hannah in Link Strategies | SEO | SEO Mistakes | SEO Tips with 7 Comments

Link building is not as easy as some SEOs make it sound. The truth is that many SEOs that promise thousands of links in several days get these links by buying links. Buying links will get you a good amount of links way faster than organically building up the number of inbound links to your site but the truth is that it isn’t that good an idea because Google considers buying links in order to pass/get page rank to be a link scheme. According to GoogleBuying or selling links that pass PageRank is in violation of Google’s webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact a site’s ranking in search results.”

Of course Google wouldn’t penalise your site if it does not find out that you have been buying links to get your page rank up. However, there is a good chance that they will find out. Eric Enge, who explained why he doesn’t buy links wrote a good entry on how Google can find out that you have been buying/selling links.

For those who do buy/sell links but for only for advertising purposes you shouldn’t really worry since Google considers this as a valid reason. However, you should make sure that the links are properly designated as links for advertising only (no passing of page rank) by…

  • Adding a rel=”nofollow” attribute to the <a> tag; or
  • Redirecting the links to an intermediate page that is blocked from search engines with a robots.txt file

If you have been buying links as part of your link building campaign or has been doing so for your clients this is a good time to rethink your strategy.

AddThis Social Bookmark ButtonAddThis Feed Button

RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 responses to Why Buying Links is NOT a Good SEO Practice

Comment by Jayson Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-27 01:59:33

The article you mentioned has some pretty good points. I’ve never thought of some of them. However, I find it hard to believe that Google or any other search engine would do more than devalue a purchased link. This is just my opinion - otherwise wouldn’t SEO and individuals companies buy sloppy or easily detectable links for their competitors?

I personally don’t think buying links is a wise decision just in case - plus there are other ways to get good links. Either way, thanks for the the article.

 
Comment by pollen Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-27 15:45:29

I do not agree for link buying. For me its a form of cheating.

 
Comment by Jennifer DeRosa Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-28 01:23:48

I understand and agree with the concept of not buying links but its okay to submit to a paid directory, correct?

Comment by Hannah
2008-02-29 23:50:17

Paid directories are fine but the truth is that you should still choose the paid directories you submit too. Not because it will penalize you but because you want to make sure you’re not wasting money when you can simply use it for better things that would yield clearer results.

 
 
Comment by Matan Media Subscribed to comments via email
2008-03-02 21:51:59

If you truly want to rank for a competitive keyword term then you pretty much have no choice but to buy links, giving you control over anchor text etc.

All the top, recognized SEOs (Rand Fishkin, Jim Boykin, Aaron Wall etc) know this, and although they don’t state it, they too know that getting a website ranking for a competitve term needs strong inlinks with the correct anchor text.

I am not saying go out and buy a million links, but if you choose your purchases carefully, Google will not catch you and your rankings will no doubt improve!

 
2008-03-05 20:32:23

[…] have already stated my position on buying/selling links but realised that I didn’t mention anything about exchanging links. In my opinion exchanging […]

 

Leave a reply


You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

catterpillar bric-a-brac mfc-420cn bangles boyslove reminder kooks bitware hondajet execunet usagi execunet 100% neverhood cleb gardenias dogtraining df pathogens 107-7 infj pony altace bycycle cinncinati moast angstrom finance-google hypertech cnn-news alvan horoscops kaarina heightmax makeout helecopter vulpix sneezwort southpark frotting selectorbbs assonance bestform antrum vag enterobacteriaceae evangeline rusk immunoassay christening pro5150 mothball krauthammer economic pennsic motlow wnba berm jefferies ride photonet oxiclean puper telangiectasias scalia hobbits intellect ebert mun2 pantiesformen espinthebottle palawan google3 magnalite ticketmaster7 cockpumpers citronella peacekeeping mauritanie scrat dumprep vsmon ostia pokemorphs hernias silkscreen herbalife kaotians ccli lanterns deadbolts marietta pooler vocational nakenbad randstand seeder etree disgaea lexpps baudrillard vendingmachine mig hag abscissor laxative xenon lm3914 pharmacopia mortification shapiro gannet saphic marks-bookmarks lawak bronners anipike sdram lalita bodypiercings arguing libel provocraft rtp cadence wowgold tendons unilock dynastar letras selmedica cueca reticles funn 91x neova myfreecams cuir[Tue, 13 May 08 21:00:06 +0000]